Three Kashmiri groups—Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Political Party, Muslim Democratic League, and Kashmir Freedom Front—have cut ties with the Hurriyat Conference and pledged allegiance to the Indian Constitution, marking a potential shift in the Valley’s separatist politics. Union Home Minister Amit Shah hailed this as a victory for the government’s post- Article 370 strategy, noting that 11 groups have now distanced themselves from separatism since 2019.
While the move is symbolically significant, Kashmir’s history demands *cautious optimism. Past reconciliations—like former militants joining elections or short-lived peace talks—often dissolved into renewed unrest. The real test lies in whether these groups genuinely disavow separatism or are merely adapting to political realities.
For this shift to matter, two things must happen: First, these groups must actively discourage radicalization, engage in democratic processes, and distance themselves from militant networks. Second, the government must ensure their transition is met with political inclusion, not just security management. If they remain marginalized, disillusionment could fuel regression.
Security agencies must stay vigilant—monitoring for dormant threats while supporting rehabilitation. At the same time, New Delhi must prove that constitutional integration brings tangible benefits, not just rhetoric. Development and dialogue, not just deterrence, will determine if this is a lasting change.
The optics are promising, but Kashmir has seen false dawns before. The burden of proof lies with both the former separatists and the Indian state. If actions match words, this could mark a turning point. If not, it risks being another fleeting moment in Kashmir’s turbulent history.
