SHAFQAT SHEIKH
The manifesto of the Jammu and Kashmir National Conference (JKNC) starkly illuminates the profound incompetence that has characterised the current governance, particularly underscored by the recent statements made by Chief Minister Omar Abdullah during the Budget Session of 2026–27. His claims, once again, reveal themselves to be as hollow as the numerous promises enshrined in the party’s election manifesto, many of which remain unfulfilled. This kind of rhetoric emanating from a sitting Chief Minister has significantly eroded public trust and confidence in the leadership.
Despite holding a commanding majority with over 58 Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs), including independents and members from the Indian National Congress (INC), the ruling JKNC has conspicuously failed to deliver meaningful advancements for the society it professes to serve. This alarming incompetence raises pressing concerns regarding their capability to foster genuine progress and adequately address the community’s needs.
In discussing the contentious matter of providing 200 units of free electricity, Chief Minister Abdullah expressed, “You are as concerned about 200 units of electricity as we are—actually, we are worried many times more. Because if I fail to deliver this, I know it becomes a question of my credibility.” He acknowledged the significance of this promise but was careful to avoid detailing the specific energy sources that would be employed to fulfil it.
Abdullah pointed out how the government has navigated the Central Government’s initiatives, particularly the Prime Minister’s Surya Ghar Muft Bijli Yojana, to honour this commitment for the current fiscal year. He contended, “Now, if we have used a bit of smart strategy and managed to make use of the central government’s scheme—perhaps by leveraging the Prime Minister’s scheme—to start providing people with 200 units of free electricity this year, then what objection do you have to that?”
In his defence, he clarified that his administration had never vowed to establish new power-generating projects. Instead, he remarked, “I said I would provide electricity, and there are many ways to provide electricity,” hinting at solutions like installing solar panels on rooftops. “If I send the bill to the central government, then if that is not cleverness, what is?” he added.
Abdullah also confirmed that the initiative would initially benefit Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY) beneficiaries, expressing hope to extend this advantage to additional categories as the government’s financial health improves. “But at least we have made a start,” he asserted. He emphasised that this move is not merely a continuation of last year’s budget promise; rather, it comes with a formal order and has been reported by the media. He assured that implementation would commence within the current financial year, marking a significant step towards actualising his administration’s commitments to the people of Jammu and Kashmir.
In a fervent media interaction, Sunil Sharma, the Leader of Opposition, delivered a scathing critique of the newly unveiled budget, branding it “disgusting” and devoid of meaningful content. His disappointment was palpable as he exclaimed, “This is a disgusting budget, where there is nothing new to behold—only old wine repackaged in a new bottle.” Sharma directed his sharpest barbs toward Omar Abdullah, accusing him of trivialising the serious challenges confronting the people of Jammu and Kashmir.
Reflecting on Abdullah’s previously made claims about the Antyodaya Yojana, Sharma remarked, “Just last year, Omar Abdullah made the light-hearted assertion that registered families would enjoy free electricity under this initiative. Yet yesterday, he swiftly backtracked, stating, ‘I never said I would provide electricity generated from water or air.’ This demonstrates his penchant for misleading the public with clever rhetoric.” He delivered a strong denunciation of Abdullah’s remarks, deeming them deceptive and adding, “The Abdullah family has resorted to a web of lies, employing cunning tactics to cheat the people.”
Sharma further probed the credibility of the promises outlined in Abdullah’s manifesto, demanding, “Where did he make it clear that assistance would be limited? Where did he suggest we would make light of the struggles faced by suffering families?” He reinforced his belief that Abdullah’s recent comments amounted to yet another form of mockery, labelling it a “big joke” at the expense of those depending on government support.
Sharma highlighted the dire circumstances faced by daily-rated workers, saying, “Within the registered families of Jammu and Kashmir, issues have languished under this government’s tenure—a shocking procrastination. During the Lieutenant Governor’s administration, we maintained a systematic approach, achieving tangible results even during our past alliances.” He questioned the current administration’s efficacy, asking, “What does ‘phased manner’ even signify in this context?”
Sharma also drew attention to the plight of SRW personnel, many of whom have aged or retired while waiting helplessly for opportunities that have remained unrealised. He expressed concern over stagnation in job creation, stating, “You requested 180 days, yet here we stand, 16 months later—how many jobs have truly been allocated? The only tangible outcome we see is funding from the Indian government, seemingly designated for legislative assemblies and local politicians rather than being funnelled into genuine support for citizens.”
He concluded his critique with a powerful assertion: “This budget is tailored to benefit a select few—predominantly those aligned with the National Conference—while turning a blind eye to the countless individuals who labour tirelessly in the fields. The funds rightfully belong to every hardworking, impoverished citizen of India, yet this budget embodies a grievous misallocation of resources. For the first time in history, we are witnessing such a disheartening budget in Jammu and Kashmir—a plan that offers nothing innovative, only the same age-old problems cloaked in new labels.”
The people of Jammu and Kashmir are increasingly suffering due to the negative consequences of rhetoric and promises made by prominent leaders during election campaigns. These leaders often resort to grandiose speeches, showcasing enticing visions to sway voters. However, as elections approach, it becomes evident that such promises often fail to materialise, leaving the community disenfranchised and frustrated.
As society evolves, there may come a time when voters prioritise integrity, capability, and vision over superficial attributes tied to caste, creed, colour, religion, or political affiliation. If the electorate rallies behind leaders who genuinely represent their interests rather than those engaging in empty theatrics, a significant shift in political dynamics could emerge. In such a scenario, even those who currently dominate the political landscape may struggle to secure positions—even in local ward elections—demonstrating the power of informed and discerning voter choices.
