Jammu & Kashmir’s Meritocracy in Crisis
Dr. Noour Ali Zehgeer
In a region where merit was once regarded as the ultimate benchmark of success, dwindling opportunities for general category candidates in Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) have left many disillusioned. Recent changes in reservation policies have drastically curtailed their share of government jobs and educational seats, reducing their competitive space to a meager 30%-40%. This paradox, in a democracy that champions equality and justice, is both curious and concerning, with far-reaching implications.
The Numbers Don’t Lie
A closer look at recent recruitment trends paints a troubling picture. Of the 575 lecturer posts referred to the Jammu and Kashmir Public Service Commission (JKPSC), only 238 were allocated to open merit candidates. The remaining 337 were reserved for various categories—a staggering 60:40 ratio favoring reserved groups. This disproportionate distribution is a glaring anomaly, especially in a region where 69% of the population belongs to the general category.
The disparity extends beyond government jobs to educational institutions. The introduction of additional reservations, including a 10% quota for Scheduled Tribes and a doubling of the OBC quota from 4% to 8%, has slashed the already limited opportunities for general candidates.
A Young Aspirant’s Struggle
The story of Zubair Ahmed, a 25-year-old aspirant from Baramulla, is emblematic of this crisis. After two years of relentless preparation for government exams, Zubair finds himself grappling with hopelessness. “Every time I open my books, the thought of injustice paralyzes me,” he shares, echoing the sentiments of thousands of others who see their dreams fading in the shadow of skewed policies.
For many like Zubair, government jobs represent the only viable path to stability in an economically fragile region. Yet, the odds are so heavily stacked against them that even their best efforts often go unrewarded.
The Quota Conundrum
The government defends its reservation policies as instruments of social justice, designed to uplift historically disadvantaged groups. However, the execution has left much to be desired. Instead of creating equitable opportunities, these policies have deepened divisions and marginalized the majority.
In J&K, the irony is palpable: the general category majority is treated as a minority when it comes to access to jobs and education. Merit, once the cornerstone of progress, has been relegated to the back seat, eroded by a system that prioritizes quotas over qualifications.
When Merit Takes a Hit
Consider this: a general category candidate scoring significantly higher in an exam may still lose out to a reserved category candidate with lower marks. This raises critical questions about fairness, competency, and the long-term impact on public services.
The principle of meritocracy is not just about rewarding talent; it is about ensuring that the most capable individuals occupy positions that influence society. By undermining this principle, the current system risks breeding mediocrity and demoralizing the youth.
J&K’s Unique Predicament
J&K’s socio-economic landscape sets it apart from other states. With a lackluster private sector and persistent economic instability, government jobs remain the backbone of employment. In such a scenario, the shrinking opportunities for general category candidates exacerbate their struggles.
The region’s demographic realities further complicate the issue. According to the 2011 Census, 69% of J&K’s population belongs to the general category. The disproportionate distribution of opportunities, therefore, appears not only inequitable but also counterproductive.
The Psychological Toll
Beyond the statistics, the human cost of these policies is profound. Candidates like Zubair wrestle with anxiety, frustration, and a deep sense of alienation. “It feels like no matter how hard we work, the system is rigged against us,” he says.
This disillusionment extends beyond individuals, affecting families, educators, and communities who invest time, effort, and hope in these aspirants. The pervasive sense of injustice chips away at their faith in the system, fostering resentment and despair.
Government Apathy
What makes the situation worse is the government’s indifference. Despite widespread protests and appeals, there has been no meaningful attempt to address the grievances of general category candidates. The rhetoric of social justice has become a convenient shield for ignoring the legitimate concerns of the majority.
Is this the inclusive democracy we aspire to? Or are we merely perpetuating a system that trades one form of discrimination for another?
A Call for Reform
Affirmative action is crucial for addressing historical injustices, but it must evolve with changing realities. Policies should be dynamic and balanced, designed to uplift disadvantaged groups without undermining the principles of merit and equality.
For J&K, this means re-evaluating reservation policies to reflect the region’s unique challenges. Policymakers must engage with stakeholders, listen to the voices of the affected, and strike a balance between social justice and meritocracy.
The Way Forward
The youth of J&K deserve a fair shot at success. Their fight for equitable opportunities is not just a plea for justice—it is a demand for a system that values hard work, talent, and integrity.
As Zubair Ahmed poignantly puts it, “We’re not asking for special treatment—just a fair chance.” This sentiment encapsulates the aspirations of countless young men and women who refuse to give up despite the odds.
It is time for policymakers to act. Let merit speak. Let justice prevail. And let the dreams of J&K’s youth find the space to flourish.
–(–Note
Dr. Noour Ali Zehgeer has 28 years of global experience and has been instrumental in launching mobile services in UP in 1995 and Punjab in 1999. He holds a PhD in Marketing and a Business Master’s from Germany. For queries, Dr. Zehgeer can be reached at noouralizehgeer@gmail.com)
