The issue of reservation is undeniably a concern for the unemployed youth of Jammu and Kashmir, but the larger and more immediate challenge lies in ensuring the legitimacy and stability of Omar Abdullah’s elected Union Territory government. Three months into its tenure, the government is still working to establish basic governance frameworks, such as service rules, which are essential for effective administration. While the election manifesto outlined bold plans to address larger issues, these can only be realized if the government is given the stability it requires to function over the next five years.
What is concerning, however, is how certain political figures have sought to exploit the situation rather than contribute to progress. Juned Mattoo, who failed to secure even a runner-up position in the elections, has aligned himself with protests, perhaps to regain relevance after being rejected by voters. Similarly, Sheikh Rasheed, whose brother is currently in jail, has also lent his voice to these destabilizing efforts.
In this already fragile political landscape, Agha Ruhullah’s recent actions and rhetoric have further complicated matters. A prominent figure within the Jammu and Kashmir National Conference (NC), Agha Ruhullah’s rise in politics has been supported by a party that stood firmly behind him, even as a Shia leader in a predominantly Sunni political arena. The party’s support was not just electoral—it was a testament to its commitment to pluralism and inclusivity. Yet, Ruhullah’s fiery speeches and confrontational stance risk undermining this very ethos.
In his attempt to be more Catholic than the Pope, Agha Ruhullah’s actions appear to be driven by a desire to stand out, but such an approach can be both destructive and dangerous. Leadership, especially in a region as complex as Jammu and Kashmir, requires sensitivity, restraint, and a focus on uniting diverse communities. By prioritizing divisive rhetoric over bridge-building, Ruhullah risks alienating not only his party but also the broader constituency he represents.
At this critical juncture, let us revisit an inspiring story from India’s political history—a story of statesmanship and unity that transcended party lines. In 1991, India was on the brink of economic collapse, with barely nine days of reserves left. Prime Minister Narasimha Rao, facing the crisis, turned to his Finance Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh, for solutions. Dr. Singh proposed devaluing the rupee by 20%—a decision that would be politically contentious.
Understanding the stakes, Narasimha Rao chose not to convene a cabinet meeting, fearing ministers would prioritize their political interests. Instead, he reached out to Atal Bihari Vajpayee, a stalwart leader of the opposition BJP, for support. Vajpayee, recognizing the gravity of the situation, assured Rao that the BJP would not oppose the move. This act of bipartisanship not only saved India from economic disaster but also laid the foundation for its economic liberalization.
This episode is a masterclass in leadership—a lesson in placing the nation above individual or party interests. It is this kind of statesmanship that Jammu and Kashmir urgently needs.
This story is a lesson in leadership—one that transcends personal ambition and focuses on the greater good. Agha Ruhullah must draw inspiration from such examples. His role as a Member of Parliament is not to champion the cause of a micro-minority but to represent the aspirations of all communities in Jammu and Kashmir and beyond. His leadership must unite, not divide, and his vision should extend to the broader needs of India’s 25 crore Muslims.
Omar Abdullah’s government, though still in its early days, represents an important step towards restoring democratic processes in Jammu and Kashmir. Destabilizing it at this stage would not only hinder governance but also risk creating deeper divides in a region that desperately needs unity and inclusivity. Opposition leaders must recognize that their role is not to sabotage but to contribute constructively, ensuring that the government delivers on its promises for the collective good of all citizens.
Agha Ruhullah’s rhetoric may earn temporary applause, but true leadership is about rising above the noise and acting in the long-term interest of the people. His actions must reflect the pluralistic values that his party stands for. By learning to navigate the complexities of Jammu and Kashmir’s political landscape with maturity and a spirit of collaboration, Ruhullah has the opportunity to strengthen not only his own legacy but also the fabric of democracy in the region.
Leadership is not about being the loudest voice in the room—it is about being the voice that unites and inspires. Agha Ruhullah must rise to this occasion, prioritizing the collective good over personal ambition. Only then can he hope to be remembered as a leader who stood for unity and progress in one of India’s most diverse and challenging regions.
