The Role of Loudspeakers in Religious Practices and the Need for Balance

Iqbal Ahmad
Iqbal Ahmad

Recent remarks by Madhya Pradesh IAS officer Shailbala Martin on the use of loudspeakers at temples and mosques have reignited the debate around noise pollution from religious places. Her comments, which criticized the unchecked use of loudspeakers at temples, often playing until late at night, highlight an issue that is equally relevant in many other regions, including Jammu & Kashmir (J&K). This conversation raises important questions about the balance between religious practices and the rights of the community to live peacefully without excessive noise.

Follow the Buzz Bytes channel on WhatsApp

In J&K, a similar outcry would likely follow if someone spoke up about the same issue, reflecting how sensitive matters of religion can become in the public discourse. However, it is worth considering that God, as understood in most faiths, does not require a microphone or loudspeaker to hear the prayers of devotees. This technological intervention, which originally might have been used to call people to prayer, has evolved into a tool that, in some cases, intrudes into the daily lives of people in surrounding areas.

Loudspeakers in Religious Practices: A Historical and Cultural Perspective

The use of loudspeakers in religious spaces is a relatively modern phenomenon. Traditionally, calls to prayer, chants, or religious hymns were done without any electronic amplification. The introduction of loudspeakers in temples and mosques came as a convenience, allowing large congregations to hear prayers, sermons, and religious songs. However, what once was an aid to worship has often turned into a tool that contributes to noise pollution, especially when used beyond reasonable hours or excessively during religious festivals.

In J&K, both Hindu and Muslim communities rely on loudspeakers for calls to prayer (Azaan in mosques) and other religious gatherings in temples. While these practices are rooted in tradition, the challenge arises when the noise transcends the boundaries of the religious space and invades the homes of those living nearby. Religious festivals in both faiths often see loudspeakers used for hours on end, sometimes well into the night, affecting sleep, peace, and the general quality of life for people who may not even be part of that religious group.

Impact on Daily Life: The Noise Problem

The key issue here is noise pollution. Residents living in the vicinity of temples, mosques, or other religious spaces often suffer from the loudspeakers’ constant blaring. In densely populated areas, especially in cities and towns in J&K, the noise can easily travel beyond the boundaries of the religious institutions, making it hard for people to escape the disturbance.

It’s important to emphasize that religious freedom is a fundamental right in India, but so is the right to live in peace and tranquility. When these two rights clash, as they often do in noise pollution cases, a balance must be found. Just as the use of fireworks and crackers is now being regulated due to the health and environmental hazards they cause, the use of loudspeakers should also be carefully controlled.

Loudspeakers and Azaan: A Special Case

One of the most contentious issues in this debate is the Azaan, the Islamic call to prayer, traditionally announced five times a day. The Azaan holds deep spiritual significance for Muslims, and many argue that the use of a loudspeaker helps people to know when it is time for prayer, particularly in large communities. However, it is also true that this practice can be a source of disturbance, particularly during the early morning hours, when the first Azaan is called before sunrise.

This is not to say that Azaan, or any religious practice for that matter, should be banned. Rather, it is about recognizing that the Azaan, which originally relied on the human voice alone, can still fulfill its purpose without the need for excessive volume. A more reasonable approach could be to use loudspeakers at a lower volume or only for certain key prayers. The recent suggestions that loudspeakers should be limited to certain times of the day, and that excessive use should be discouraged, is a step in the right direction.

The Need for Community Dialogue and Sensitivity

To address these concerns without inflaming communal tensions, what is needed is a measured, sensitive dialogue between religious leaders, local authorities, and community members. The issue is not about targeting one religion over another, but about acknowledging the impact that these practices can have on everyone, regardless of their faith.

For instance, if temples or mosques were to voluntarily reduce the volume of their loudspeakers or limit their use to essential announcements, it would go a long way in fostering goodwill. It is important for religious institutions to recognize their responsibility towards the broader community. The argument that “God will hear us anyway” resonates here; indeed, spiritual practice is a deeply personal experience, and loudspeakers are not necessary for the divine to hear one’s prayers.

Moreover, public policy should aim to regulate noise levels for all, without discrimination. Guidelines on the permissible volume and hours for using loudspeakers should be enforced equally, whether for temples, mosques, or any other institutions. This would help prevent unnecessary confrontations and ensure that religious harmony is maintained.

Conclusion: Seeking Balance

The recent controversy in Madhya Pradesh is a reminder that as societies evolve, so must their practices. J&K, like many other regions in India, is home to diverse religious practices, and ensuring harmony requires finding a balance between tradition and modern living. Loudspeakers should be regulated in a way that respects both religious traditions and the rights of individuals to peace and quiet. Restricting their use to essential purposes, such as the Azaan, while ensuring that the volume is kept to reasonable levels, is a solution that respects the spiritual and practical needs of all.

In the end, it is not about silencing religious expression but about ensuring that it does not come at the cost of public welfare. As the saying goes, “Iss shoor se na khuda milega, na wasal-e-sanam.” True spiritual connection, whether with God or with humanity, comes from peace, not noise.