The politics of Jammu and Kashmir continues to drift between inertia and confrontation. The JKNC, despite its legacy and influence, has failed to show proactive governance. Its silence on key public concerns reflects a lack of urgency to deliver on promises. On the other side, the PDP has turned opposition into an end in itself. Criticism is valid in any democracy, but when it becomes reflexive and empty, it loses purpose. A politics of obstruction leaves people frustrated and aspirations unmet.
The PDP’s strategy of opposing every move of the elected Union Territory government may create headlines, but it does little to advance solutions. Worse, its desire to see the JKNC fail in governance signals a pursuit of power over welfare. This is a zero-sum politics that serves neither democracy nor the stability of the region.
Altaf Bukhari’s Apni Party faces a different dilemma. Branded as a “B-team” of the BJP, it struggles to build credibility despite Bukhari’s repeated calls for development and neutrality. Its poor electoral record and the perception of Central backing weigh it down. Yet, Bukhari still has space to make his party relevant by focusing on what matters most to the people—jobs, infrastructure, and dignity in daily life.
J&K’s hybrid governance system leaves limited room for political theatrics. What remains possible is practical collaboration to secure growth, improve services, and restore faith in politics. For this, the JKNC must act instead of resting on history. The PDP must shift from destructive criticism to constructive engagement. And Bukhari’s Apni Party must prove independence through consistent delivery.
The people of J&K deserve a politics of responsibility, not rivalry. Only through collective effort can leaders translate promises into progress.
