Sidiq Khan
The discussion over obscenity should not be restricted to isolated incidents or public performances. In an era where digital platforms dominate everyday life, the issue deserves a broader and more balanced public conversation. If society raises objections to objectionable performances on public stages but ignores similar material circulating online, the debate loses consistency.
The expansion of smartphones and affordable internet has fundamentally changed the entertainment ecosystem. Millions of people are no longer just consumers but also creators of content. This transformation has encouraged innovation and provided opportunities for new artists. At the same time, it has intensified competition for attention, where online visibility is often determined by algorithms rather than artistic merit.
Many creators now depend on engagement driven platforms where clicks, shares, and watch time translate into financial rewards. As a result, provocative language, suggestive performances, controversial themes, and sensational presentations frequently receive greater exposure than educational or creative content. Commercial incentives sometimes encourage content that prioritises shock value over substance.
India’s streaming platforms have also transformed storytelling by producing critically acclaimed films, documentaries, and original series. These platforms have expanded opportunities for filmmakers and audiences alike. Nevertheless, concerns arise when explicit scenes, excessive profanity, or graphic violence appear to be included primarily to generate publicity rather than to advance the narrative. Such practices have fuelled an ongoing public debate about the balance between artistic freedom and commercial interests.
The argument that explicit content is intended only for adults does not fully address the realities of the digital world. Children and teenagers often have unrestricted access to smartphones, while age verification systems remain imperfect. Parents face increasing challenges in monitoring online viewing habits. Consequently, protecting young audiences requires more than warning labels or age classifications.
Research in developmental psychology suggests that children and adolescents are influenced by multiple social environments, including families, schools, peer groups, and digital media. Although media alone does not determine behaviour, repeated exposure to certain forms of language, attitudes, and conduct can contribute to shaping perceptions and social norms. This makes media literacy an increasingly important component of education.
The concept of obscenity itself is neither fixed nor universal. Standards vary across cultures and evolve over time. Democratic societies must protect freedom of expression and allow artists to explore controversial themes. However, freedom of expression also carries responsibilities. Distinguishing between genuine artistic expression and content created primarily to attract attention through explicit material remains an important challenge.
Viewers also influence the direction of the entertainment industry. Online platforms respond to audience preferences, and creators naturally produce content that attracts greater engagement. Therefore, public concern over declining standards cannot focus exclusively on producers while overlooking consumer behaviour. Responsible viewing habits are as important as responsible content creation.
Public authorities can contribute by strengthening digital safety measures instead of relying solely on censorship. Effective parental controls, transparent content ratings, accessible complaint mechanisms, improved age verification practices, and greater accountability for digital platforms can help create a safer online environment without unnecessarily restricting creative freedom.
Schools and families also have an important role. Digital literacy should equip young people with the ability to evaluate online material critically, recognise harmful content, and understand responsible digital citizenship. Parents should encourage open discussions about online experiences instead of depending solely on restrictions or surveillance.
India’s artistic traditions demonstrate that entertainment can be engaging without relying on vulgarity. Literature, theatre, music, cinema, and folk culture provide numerous examples of creative excellence combined with social sensitivity. Quality storytelling has repeatedly proven that meaningful entertainment and commercial success are not mutually exclusive.
Ultimately, the discussion is not about opposing technology or restricting artistic expression. It is about encouraging a healthier digital culture in which creativity, dignity, and social responsibility coexist. If public concern over obscenity is to be credible, it must address all platforms equally, from public events to smartphones. Only then can the debate contribute to a more thoughtful and balanced cultural environment.
