The Silenced Voice of Afkar Alvi
Afkar Alvi, a young Saraiki poet who gained fame through his poignant and rebellious verses, now finds himself embroiled in controversy. A sworn affidavit of the poet has been making rounds on social media, where he has pledged to refrain from writing any poetry deemed critical of national institutions or religious sects. In his declaration, Alvi asserts that he has always been a peaceful citizen and denies ever composing poetry that could offend these entities. He further claims that his words have been misinterpreted and used against him.

This development comes after Alvi’s verses such as “Murshid, our army fights not the enemy, for it is preoccupied with us” and “Our soldiers, don’t shoot us” struck a chord with many but also provoked ire from certain quarters. The young poet, once hailed for his courage to speak truth to power, now finds himself disowning his past work and vowing to steer clear of such themes in the future.
One of his most celebrated lines, “Murshid, I could not fight, but I screamed; I did not stay silent and endorse oppression”, now rings hollow. His scream, once a defiant roar against injustice, has been caged, leaving a vacuum in the collective consciousness of those who seek truth and justice through art. The affidavit symbolizes the coerced silence of yet another voice in a long line of artists, writers, and intellectuals who have faced censorship, intimidation, or outright repression in Pakistan.
The Price of Speaking Truth
Afkar Alvi’s plight is not an isolated incident. Throughout history, poets, writers, and thinkers have been targeted by regimes and establishments for challenging the status quo. Pakistan, in particular, has a grim history of silencing dissenting voices. From Ahmed Faraz to Habib Jalib, Faiz Ahmed Faiz to Saadat Hasan Manto, numerous luminaries have endured state oppression. Their words, often laced with bitter truths about societal and political injustices, threatened those in power and, consequently, invited censorship, imprisonment, or exile.
Ahmed Faraz once remarked, “Silence is a crime in the face of oppression.” Yet, silence is precisely what the state often demands. Artists and intellectuals are forced to choose between their conscience and their safety, and many, like Alvi, are coerced into self-censorship. This phenomenon, known as “state-imposed self-censorship,” reflects not only the oppressive nature of the establishment but also the stifling of creativity and critical thought within society.
The Legacy of Resistance
The history of Pakistani art and literature, however, is also replete with stories of defiance. Habib Jalib, the poet of revolution, refused to bow down to oppressive regimes. His words, “Main nahi manta, main nahi jaanta” (I do not accept, I do not acknowledge), became an anthem for resistance against tyranny. Faiz Ahmed Faiz’s verses, often composed from within the confines of prison cells, continue to inspire those who fight for justice and freedom. Saadat Hasan Manto, despite facing countless obscenity trials, never wavered in his commitment to portray the harsh realities of society.
These figures remind us that while oppression may momentarily silence voices, it cannot extinguish the spirit of resistance. Their courage serves as a beacon of hope for artists like Afkar Alvi, who find themselves at the crossroads of fear and truth.
The Role of Art in Challenging Oppression
Art, in all its forms, serves as a mirror to society. It has the power to expose injustices, question authority, and inspire change. In societies plagued by inequality and repression, art becomes a tool of rebellion—a voice for the voiceless and a weapon against tyranny. For this reason, oppressive regimes often target artists and intellectuals, recognizing the threat they pose to the established order.
Afkar Alvi’s poetry, much like that of his predecessors, resonated with those who felt disillusioned by the state’s actions. His verses spoke of the struggles of ordinary people, the misuse of power, and the unfulfilled promises of justice and equality. By silencing him, the state not only suppresses his voice but also attempts to erase the collective grievances of those he represents.
The Cost of Silence
The silencing of dissent has far-reaching consequences for any society. When voices like Afkar Alvi’s are stifled, society loses its moral compass. Art and literature cease to challenge norms or provoke thought, leaving a void filled only by conformity and mediocrity. This stagnation not only hampers cultural and intellectual growth but also weakens the foundations of democracy and justice.
Moreover, the forced silencing of artists breeds fear and apathy among the masses. It sends a chilling message that dissent will not be tolerated, discouraging others from speaking out. Over time, this creates a culture of complacency, where oppression goes unchecked, and injustices are normalized.
The Way Forward
The current climate in Pakistan, marked by increasing censorship and repression, calls for a collective awakening. As state control over narratives tightens, it becomes imperative for civil society, intellectuals, and artists to reclaim their space. Resistance does not always have to be overt; sometimes, it lies in subtle acts of defiance, in finding new ways to speak truths that cannot be silenced.
For Afkar Alvi, this moment could mark the beginning of a new chapter. While his affidavit may seem like a surrender, it could also be a turning point—a realization that the fight for truth requires resilience and strategy. Like Habib Jalib and Faiz Ahmed Faiz before him, Alvi has the potential to transform his pain and oppression into a powerful testament of resistance.
Conclusion
Afkar Alvi’s silencing is a grim reminder of the challenges faced by artists in oppressive regimes. Yet, it also underscores the enduring power of art as a force for truth and justice. As Jalib aptly put it:
“Aaj shaayar pe bhi qarz hai mitti ka,
Ab qalam mein lahu hai siyahi nahin.”
(Today, even the poet owes a debt to the land;
Now, there is blood in the pen, not ink.)
Afkar Alvi’s voice may have been caged for now, but the echoes of his words will continue to resonate. It is up to society to ensure that these echoes grow louder, breaking the chains of silence and paving the way for a freer, more just future. The fight for truth is never easy, but it is a fight worth waging—for without truth, there can be no freedom.