The absence of elected Panchayats (village councils) and Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) in Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) is a pressing issue that has far-reaching consequences for the region’s governance and democracy. The situation has become particularly dire since the term of these bodies ended in December 2023, with no fresh elections being conducted. This hiatus in local governance is not only undermining the democratic framework but also hampering the implementation of critical laws, such as the Forest Rights Act (FRA). Despite the significant impact on rural communities and the overall development process, local political parties appear remarkably indifferent to the urgent need for these elections. This raises serious questions about their priorities and commitment to grassroots democracy.
The Importance of Panchayats and ULBs
Local self-governance through Panchayats and ULBs is the cornerstone of India’s democratic system, particularly in a state like Jammu and Kashmir, where vast areas are rural, and the population relies heavily on local governance for development and justice. Panchayats and ULBs play a crucial role in implementing various government schemes, ensuring local development, and addressing community-specific issues. They are also pivotal in the enforcement of laws like the FRA, which recognizes the rights of forest-dwelling communities to own and use forest land.
The FRA, enacted in 2006, is a landmark legislation that empowers forest communities, allowing them rights to cultivate, graze, and access non-timber forest products. However, its successful implementation hinges on the active participation of Gram Sabhas (village assemblies), which are supposed to be convened by elected Panchayat representatives. Without these representatives, the execution of the FRA is virtually paralyzed, leaving vulnerable communities in a state of legal limbo.
Key Schemes at Risk
The lack of local governance is not just a theoretical concern; it has practical implications for the execution of several key development schemes that are essential for the socio-economic upliftment of the region’s rural population. Some of the most significant schemes affected by the absence of Panchayats and ULBs include:
1. Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA):
This scheme aims to enhance the livelihood security of rural households by providing at least 100 days of wage employment in a financial year. The success of MGNREGA heavily depends on the local administration’s ability to identify and implement suitable projects that benefit the community. Without elected local bodies, the identification of projects, distribution of work, and resolution of grievances become haphazard, leading to delays and inefficiencies.
2. Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY):
PMAY aims to provide affordable housing to the rural poor. The scheme’s implementation relies on local governance to identify beneficiaries, allocate funds, and oversee the construction process. In the absence of Panchayats, the identification process can be flawed, leading to either the exclusion of deserving candidates or the inclusion of ineligible ones, undermining the scheme’s goals.
3. Swachh Bharat Mission (SBM):
The SBM is a flagship program aimed at achieving universal sanitation coverage and improving cleanliness, particularly in rural areas. Local bodies are crucial in mobilizing communities, spreading awareness, and monitoring the construction of toilets and waste management systems. The absence of local representatives stalls the progress of these activities, making it challenging to achieve the mission’s objectives.
4. Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana (PMUY):
PMUY is aimed at providing LPG connections to women from Below Poverty Line (BPL) households. The role of Panchayats in identifying eligible households and ensuring they receive the necessary support is crucial for the scheme’s success. The lack of elected representatives can lead to lapses in beneficiary identification and delays in providing connections.
5. PM Mufit Bijlee Yojna:
This scheme is designed to provide electricity to every household, ensuring that even the most remote areas have access to power. Local governance bodies are vital in assessing the areas that need electrification and in resolving any logistical issues that arise during implementation. Without these bodies, the process of electrification can be delayed, leaving many households in the dark.
The Political Apathy
One of the most concerning aspects of this issue is the apparent apathy of local political parties toward the delayed Panchayat and ULB elections. While there is a growing debate on the need for assembly elections in J&K, the silence on the Panchayat and ULB elections is deafening. This lack of concern from political parties is puzzling, given that these local bodies are instrumental in the region’s governance and development.
The indifference of political parties to these elections suggests a disconnect between their priorities and the needs of the local population. Assembly elections are undoubtedly important, but so are Panchayat and ULB elections, which directly impact the daily lives of people in rural and urban areas. The reluctance to push for these elections could indicate a preference for centralized power structures over decentralized, people-centric governance.
Why the Indifference?
Several factors might explain why local political parties are not championing the cause of Panchayat and ULB elections:
1. Centralized Power Structures:
There is a tendency among political parties to focus on assembly and parliamentary elections, which are seen as more prestigious and powerful. Panchayat and ULB elections, being more localized, might be perceived as less significant in the broader political landscape.
2. Political Calculations:
Political parties may be wary of the outcomes of local elections, which could potentially weaken their control over certain areas. Elected Panchayats and ULBs could empower local leaders who might not align with the broader party agenda, leading to a decentralized power structure that is harder to manage.
3. Security Concerns:
The security situation in J&K has always been a concern, and the conduct of elections, particularly in rural areas, poses significant challenges. However, this cannot be the sole reason for the delay, as elections have been conducted in the past despite security threats.
4. Lack of Public Pressure:
The absence of strong public demand for these elections might also contribute to the political indifference. Without significant pressure from the electorate, political parties might not see the urgency to push for Panchayat and ULB elections.
The Way Forward
The current situation in Jammu and Kashmir is untenable. The absence of elected local bodies is stalling development, delaying justice, and eroding the democratic fabric of the region. It is imperative that the government and political parties prioritize the conduct of Panchayat and ULB elections to restore local governance and empower communities.
Local political parties, in particular, must recognize the importance of these elections and actively advocate for them. They should engage with the electorate, raise awareness about the significance of local governance, and push for the timely conduct of elections. This will not only strengthen democracy at the grassroots level but also ensure that laws like the FRA are effectively implemented, benefiting the most vulnerable sections of society.
In conclusion, the delay in Panchayat and ULB elections in Jammu and Kashmir is a critical issue that needs immediate attention. The indifference of political parties is concerning and raises serious questions about their commitment to local governance and the welfare of the people. It is time for all stakeholders to come together and ensure that these elections are held without further delay, restoring the democratic process and empowering the people of Jammu and Kashmir.
——-++++
