The political landscape of Kashmir has been fraught with turmoil and mistrust, largely attributed to the alleged misdeeds and electoral manipulations of veteran politician Farooq Abdullah. As we reflect on his decades-long tenure, it becomes evident that his legacy is marred by controversies and accusations of rigging, casting a shadow over Kashmir’s democratic aspirations.
Farooq Abdullah’s involvement in the alleged rigging of the 1987 assembly elections remains a contentious issue, serving as a catalyst for the region’s prolonged period of unrest and bloodshed. The echoes of electoral malpractice reverberate through Kashmir’s history, undermining the credibility of the democratic process and eroding public trust in political institutions.
The recent calls by Peoples Conference President Sajad Gani Lone for an investigation into the conduct of the 1987 elections underscore the gravity of the allegations leveled against Abdullah and his associates. Lone’s demand for the registration of a case against Abdullah highlights the urgent need for accountability and transparency in Kashmir’s electoral affairs. He had endured a very rich legacy, especially of his father Late Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah who, despite his negatives and positives, was the most popular leader ever produced in Kashmir, holding a tight grip over masses. Farooq Abdullah has failed to live up to that hallmark.
Farooq Abdullah’s tenure as Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir was marked by allegations of authoritarianism and electoral manipulation, further deepening the rift between the government and the people. The persistent grievances of Kashmiris, stemming from perceived injustices and marginalization, have fueled widespread discontent and resistance against Abdullah’s administration.
Despite his efforts to portray himself as a champion of Kashmiri interests, Abdullah’s legacy is tarnished by allegations of betrayal and exploitation of the region’s aspirations. His failure to address the socio-economic disparities and political grievances of Kashmiris has contributed to a sense of disillusionment and alienation among the populace. His biggest drawback as a leader has been how carefree and dismissive he has been of serious issues confronting the masses, and cracking a joke as an answer to the sufferings of the masses of Jammu and Kashmir. He played a hypocritical role by advocating himself as staunch Indian in Delhi, and acting as a separatist in Srinagar. This duplicity of him and other mainstream politicians cost Kashmir a dear price in the form of ugly bloodshed and destruction of the future of Youth.
The recent confession by the Indian National Congress regarding the rigging of the 1987 elections sheds light on the complicity of mainstream political parties in perpetuating electoral fraud and subverting the democratic will of the people. The acknowledgment of past wrongdoings serves as a stark reminder of the need for comprehensive electoral reforms and accountability measures to prevent the recurrence of such incidents in the future.
As Farooq Abdullah steps back from the electoral fray, citing health reasons, his departure marks the end of an era in Kashmiri politics. However, his exit is not without controversy, as questions linger about the unresolved allegations of electoral malpractice and misconduct during his tenure. Although, a bright spot of playing a positive role in the conduct of the 1996 elections when terror and blasts were hourly norms in Jammu and Kashmir needs to be mentioned. The conduct of 1996 elections, to some extent, weakened the grip of terror. But Farooq Abdullah could not capitalize on this historic opportunity further, as disappointment by and large marred his Chief Ministerial tenure.
The twilight of Farooq Abdullah’s political journey in Kashmir symbolizes a reckoning with the past and a call for accountability. It is imperative for the authorities to heed the demands for justice and transparency, particularly regarding the alleged rigging of the 1987 elections. Only through genuine dialogue, accountability, and inclusivity can the wounds of the past be healed, and the promise of democracy fulfilled in Kashmir. Farooq Abdullah had promised a phase of progress for the youth of Jammu and Kashmir but overall could not deliver on that promise. The manner, especially marred by corrupt practices of running the affairs of Jammu and Kashmir Cricket as its top administrator, stands out. He robbed the future of many bright cricketers by a hazy selection process.
In conclusion, Farooq Abdullah’s political legacy in Kashmir is fraught with allegations of electoral manipulation and authoritarianism, casting a long shadow over the region’s democratic aspirations. As Kashmir embarks on a new chapter in its political journey, it is essential to confront the injustices of the past and strive towards a future built on principles of transparency, accountability, and genuine representation. At the fag end of his life, he needs to have introspection and seek forgiveness from masses for his Himalayan blunders.
L
